PARALLEL AND BANK OPERATIONS TRANSFORMERS MATCHING
How To Match Transformers For Banking and Parallel Operation?
The following rules must be obeyed in order to successfully connect two or more transformers in parallel with each other:
1. The turns ratios of all of the transformers must be nearly equal.
2. The phase angle displacements of all of the transformers must be identical.
3. The series impedances of all transformers must be nearly equal, when expressed as ‘‘%Z’’ using the transformer impedance base.
The first two rules are required so that the open-circuit secondary voltages of the transformers are closely matched in order to avoid excessive circulating currents when the parallel connections are made.
The last rule is based on the fact that for a given voltage rating and %Z, the ohmic impedance of a transformer is inversely proportional to its KVA rating. When transformers having the same %Z are connected in parallel, the load currents will split in proportion to the KVA ratings of the units.
Therefore, transformers with different KVA ratings can be successfully operated in parallel as long as their %Z values are all approximately the same.
Example
(This example is based on an actual event.)
Two three-phase 10,000 KVA 66,000Δ-12,470Y volt transformers were in parallel operation in a substation. The primaries of the two transformers are connected to a 66 kV transmission line through a single air break switch.
This switch is designed to interrupt magnetizing current only, which is less than 1 A. The transformers were being removed from service and the secondary loads had been removed. A switchman then started to open the air break switch, expecting to see a small arc as the magnetizing current was interrupted.
Instead, there was a loud ‘‘bang’’ and there was a ball of flame where the air break switch contacts had vaporized. Something was obviously wrong.
Upon closer inspection, it was revealed that the two transformers had been set on widely different taps: The first transformer was on the 62,700 V primary tap and the second transformer was on the 69,300 V primary tap.
Both transformers had a 7% impedance. Because the turns ratios were unequal, a circulating current was set up even without any secondary load. The opencircuit secondary voltage difference, assuming 66 kV at the transformer primaries, is calculated below.
ΔEs = 66,000 x ( 12,470/ 62,700 - 12,470/69,300 ) V = 1250 V = 0.10 per unit
The per-unit circulating current in the secondary loop is equal to ΔEs divided by the sum of the per-unit impedances of the two transformers:
Ic = 0.10/ 0.14 = 0.714 per unit
Converting Ic into amperes:
Ic = 0.714 x 10,000 KVA/(12.47 kV 1.732) = 331 A per phase
Since Ic flows in a loop in the secondary circuit, the current out of the secondary of the first transformer equals the current into the secondary of the second transformer. But since the turns ratios are not equal, Ic does not get transformed into equal and opposite currents at the primaries.
Primary current of first transformer
65.8 A per phase
Primary current of second transformer
59.6 A per phase
The net current through the air break switch, IAB, is the difference in the primary currents:
IAB 65.8 A per phase 59.6 A per phase 6.2 A per phase
The current through the air break switch supplies the I2c Xs reactive losses of both transformers and therefore lags the primary voltage by 90°. The resulting current exceeded the interrupting rating of the switch, causing it to fail.
POWER TRANSFORMER | DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER | TRANSFORMER DESIGN | TRANSFORMER PRINCIPLES | TRANSFORMER THEORY | TRANSFORMER INSTALLATION | TRANSFORMER TUTORIALS
EFFECTS OF SHORT CIRCUITS ON TRANSFORMERS BASICS AND TUTORIALS
EFFECTS OF SHORT CIRCUITS ON TRANSFORMERS BASIC
What Are The Effects Of Short Circuits On Transformers?
Transformers are susceptible to damage by secondary short-circuit currents having magnitudes that can be many times rated load current. The damage results from the following effects:
• The I 2R losses in the winding conductors are increased by the square of the current. This increases the temperature rise of the windings.
Because protective devices limit the duration of short circuits (as opposed to overloads), the temperature rise of the winding can be calculated by dividing the total energy released by the I 2R losses by the thermal capacity of the conductor.
• The short-circuit currents exclude flux in the core and increase stray flux around the core. This stray flux induces currents in metallic parts other than the winding conductors, which can be damaged thermally.
• A short circuit applied to the secondary circuit of an autotransformer can substantially increase the voltage across the series winding and across the common winding through induction.
This not only presents the possibility of damaging the winding insulation by overvoltage, but will also drive the core into saturation and significantly increase core losses with potential damaging effects from temperature.
• Bushings and tap changers have current ratings that are usually only marginally greater than the rated load of the transformer.
Since fault currents are many times rated currents and these components have short thermal time constants, they can be seriously overloaded and thermally damaged.
• Stray flux in the vicinity of current-carrying conductors produces mechanical forces on the conductors. When a short circuit is applied to a transformer, there is a significant increase in stray flux, resulting in greater mechanical forces on the windings, leads, bushings, and all other current-carrying components.
These components, especially the windings, must be braced to withstand these forces.
A good transformer design must take all of the above effects into account to minimize the risk of damage and assure a long service life.
What Are The Effects Of Short Circuits On Transformers?
Transformers are susceptible to damage by secondary short-circuit currents having magnitudes that can be many times rated load current. The damage results from the following effects:
• The I 2R losses in the winding conductors are increased by the square of the current. This increases the temperature rise of the windings.
Because protective devices limit the duration of short circuits (as opposed to overloads), the temperature rise of the winding can be calculated by dividing the total energy released by the I 2R losses by the thermal capacity of the conductor.
• The short-circuit currents exclude flux in the core and increase stray flux around the core. This stray flux induces currents in metallic parts other than the winding conductors, which can be damaged thermally.
• A short circuit applied to the secondary circuit of an autotransformer can substantially increase the voltage across the series winding and across the common winding through induction.
This not only presents the possibility of damaging the winding insulation by overvoltage, but will also drive the core into saturation and significantly increase core losses with potential damaging effects from temperature.
• Bushings and tap changers have current ratings that are usually only marginally greater than the rated load of the transformer.
Since fault currents are many times rated currents and these components have short thermal time constants, they can be seriously overloaded and thermally damaged.
• Stray flux in the vicinity of current-carrying conductors produces mechanical forces on the conductors. When a short circuit is applied to a transformer, there is a significant increase in stray flux, resulting in greater mechanical forces on the windings, leads, bushings, and all other current-carrying components.
These components, especially the windings, must be braced to withstand these forces.
A good transformer design must take all of the above effects into account to minimize the risk of damage and assure a long service life.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Previous Articles
-
▼
2025
(162)
-
▼
December
(39)
- MASTERING SIMULATION IN ELECTRONIC DESIGN: A COMPR...
- UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS AND POTENTIAL OF CIR...
- MASTERING OSCILLOSCOPES AND LOGIC ANALYZERS: A COM...
- MASTERING OSCILLOSCOPES: A GUIDE FOR ELECTRICAL EN...
- UNDERSTANDING MULTIMETERS AND OSCILLOSCOPES: A COM...
- MASTERING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING: THE ESSENTIAL TO...
- UNDERSTANDING CONSTANT CURRENT SOURCES IN ELECTRON...
- INNOVATIVE CIRCUITS: ENHANCING ELECTRONIC DESIGN W...
- OPTIMIZING PRODUCT DESIGN THROUGH MODULARIZATION A...
- ENGINEERING DESIGN: ADAPTING TO CHANGE IN A DYNAMI...
- ENSURING ROBUSTNESS IN ELECTRONIC DESIGN: A COMPRE...
- DESIGNING ROBUST ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS: NAVIGATING IN...
- UNDERSTANDING COMPONENT ERRORS IN ELECTRONIC DESIGN
- UNDERSTANDING ALTERNATING CURRENT: A DEEP DIVE INT...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICITY: THE SCIENCE BEHIND CURR...
- UNDERSTANDING THEVENIN'S THEOREM: A DEEP DIVE INTO...
- UNDERSTANDING THEVENIN’S THEOREM: A KEY TOOL IN CI...
- MASTERING ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS: THE POWER OF THEVEN...
- MASTERING ELECTRICAL FUNDAMENTALS: A DEEP DIVE INT...
- UNDERSTANDING TIME CONSTANTS IN ELECTRONICS: THE K...
- UNDERSTANDING VOLTAGE DIVIDERS AND RC CIRCUITS IN ...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE: THE FOUNDATION...
- MASTERING OHM'S LAW: THE CORNERSTONE OF ELECTRICAL...
- MASTERING THE FUNDAMENTALS: WHY BASIC PRINCIPLES A...
- MASTERING THE FUNDAMENTALS: THE LEGO APPROACH TO E...
- MASTERING ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS: THE PATH TO INTUITI...
- INTUITIVE SIGNAL ANALYSIS: MASTERING THE ART OF PR...
- UNDERSTANDING OSCILLATION IN ELECTRICAL AND MECHAN...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS: A DEEP DIVE I...
- MASTERING ESTIMATION IN ENGINEERING: A CRUCIAL SKI...
- MASTERING UNIT CONVERSIONS: A CRUCIAL SKILL FOR EV...
- UNLOCKING THE MAGIC OF ELECTRICITY: A GUIDE TO UND...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICITY: THE DYNAMIC FORCE BEHIN...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICITY: VOLTAGE, CURRENT, AND T...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICITY: A DEEP DIVE INTO CHARGE...
- UNDERSTANDING ATOMIC STRUCTURE: CHARGE AND ELECTRO...
- UNDERSTANDING ELECTRICITY: A JOURNEY THROUGH ATOMS...
- MASTERING ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES: A GUIDE FOR STUD...
- UNLOCKING THE POWER OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING: A G...
-
▼
December
(39)